Case Study #2: Too Many Coaches Spoiling
the Game?
 |
| PROBLEM: |
| A client was not happy with
the consistency of coaching services provided to
managers in its’ organization. |
|
 |
| SOLUTION: |
| Analysis, bid and negotiations. The analysis showed
that the company was currently using 11 vendors,
and had a total of 13 that had been used at one time
or another. This was not a vendor issue. The vendors
were doing what the person who engaged them wanted
them to do. This was an organization issue, because
staff members at different locations were told they
needed the service, and were left to their own desires
as to what that meant in terms of service level and
cost of service. The organization was losing the
opportunity to ensure that a consistent program,
and message, was being delivered across the organization
let alone loss of leverage to negotiate a volume
of service. |
|
 |
 |
| RESULTS: |
| The list of approved vendors
was reduced to two – a preferred provider
and a back-up – resulting in a more consistent
program and a more satisfied line management. Confusion
over which vendor to select was narrowed significantly,
which in turn improved the overall program effectiveness
with a lower total organization cost. In this case,
neither the lowest nor highest cost provider was
selected. The lowest cost provider could not provide
some of the critical services deemed necessary,
and the highest cost provider was, well, too expensive. |
|
|
©2002 M. B. Taylor Associates, LLC |